In the past week, I’ve received numerous emails, comments, and reactions to the general concept of migrating Notes to SharePoint.
I wanted to post a brief synthesis of some of the main points, and add some commentary of my own:

1) Notes vs. SharePoint is not comparing apples to apples. Quickr is the better comparison tool.
This is true. However, Quickr does not have the market penetration that Notes in general does. Much as I’d like to say it is a fair discussion for organizations in my situation, unless you already have Quickr going in your environment, it just isn’t realistic. We’re talking about determining the best platform for our current functions, not evaluating a new platform for future collaboration. Quickr just is not a consideration in our current environment, for political, if not technical reasons.


2) Web enabling an entire Notes environment is a difficult, expensive task.

Maybe it is because I’ve been web-enabling Notes apps since the first IBM-internal beta of R5, but I just don’t think it is as difficult as people are making it out to be. There is certainly a large learning curve, but I got over that curve almost 10 years ago. Am I the exception? From all the wonderful tips and techniques offered in the blog-o-sphere, I thought more Notes developers were comfortable in this arena. Is my perception inaccurate?

That being said, I agree that a 100% web enablement would be a chore. We’re more likely to pick the easy apps, and pick the apps with a large user base. If we can web enable enough apps to decrease the number of Notes Clients in the environment, we decrease support and maintenance costs. The more we decrease those costs, the more management will support keeping Notes/Domino as a technology platform.

3) Why would you migrate anyway?

It all comes down to cost. I think everyone will agree that today, Notes is cheaper to run. We already have a talented staff, the environment is stable, we have processes in place, etc. In addition, truly talented SharePoint experts are rare and expensive. A lot of people have it on their resume, but they crash and burn in a real project situation.

So with all that in mind, how can SharePoint save money? People I have spoken with believe that in 3-5 years, the costs will reverse. 3-5 years from now, SharePoint folks will be as common as C# folks are today. Microsoft will have released one or two more major releases, and will respond to the major weaknesses being identified in the platform. (With Ray Ozzie at its helm, no less…)

On the other hand, Lotus folks are a dwindling population, at least in my area. I’ve talked to a number of organizations who will accept a greater cost today to get to the platform that they believe will become cheaper as Microsoft responds to the weaknesses of SharePoint, and the talent pool increases their skillsets.

After all the talks, my general strategy hasn’t changed much from one of my previous posts, and it is very close to becoming the official strategy at my workplace:

  1.  Increase the internal skillset on SharePoint, BizTalk, .NET, etc. to reduce the amount of consulting required on the platform.
  2.  Web enable Notes apps, and integrate them with a SharePoint portal, striving for a reduction in Notes client deployments.
  3.  Create new apps in .NET/SharePoint, unless Notes has a clear cost and speed advantage for the specific functions requested.

Let me just add one or two caveats:

  • If you are already on Quickr, your strategy may be different.
  • If you are so large that the enterprise-level weaknesses of SharePoint are unacceptable to you, Notes makes more sense.

And I would like to close with an open-ended question — given the following root causes of the desire of “management” to migrate to Notes…

1) Decreasing Lotus talent pool, and increasing cost of that talent.
2) Confidence that MS will resolve their SharePoint issues, and decrease long-term costs and pains in a SharePoint world.

….What can IBM/Lotus do to turn around migrations like mine?

(From a truly unbiased point of view, I shouldn’t care. But with 15 years of Notes experience, but only 2 years of .NET, and 6 months of SharePoint experience, I just plain got more skillz on the Lotus side, and I’d like to use them.)

6 Responses to “Synthesis of Discussions on Notes v. SharePoint”

  1. Goran Says:

    Sounds like real adventure to move to SharePoint. And Quickr is not the only option you have in IBM/Lotus world.
    I suppose upgrading your environment with websphere portal would be a smarter way to go. It is providing simpler ways to web enable your Notes applications and is much more powerful platform than Sharepoint.
    Of cource Java programers are expensive but it appears that .Net & Sharepoint tallents are even more expensive.
    In my experience it takes 2-3 months to train average a java developer to work with portal, but after that he/she became very productive – you are not going to need more than 2 of them.
    And all of your Notes/Domino internal assets and skill are still valuable as integrating notes applications with portal will give your users just a second option to work with them.

  2. Debbie Says:

    Do you see in encouragement in the announcement that IBM has a program at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) campus in Rochester, N.Y, where RIT undergraduate students selected by IBM will perform design, development and technical support roles from within IBM’s lab on RIT’s campus? Granted it it Web 2.0 and not Domino but it is something. What’s your take on this?

  3. migratenotes Says:

    @1) Websphere was briefly discussed. But it suffers the same logistical problem as Quickr, but even more so — it is a new platform, and we are trying to get down to 1 platform, not add a 3rd.

    @2) I’m not familiar with that program, but it sounds like a good idea. IBM has always been successful at engaging college students. The problem is that once they graduate and get hired on full-time, many of them only stick around for a few years. IBM is just a launching point to something else. It is a cultural thing, IMO… I’ve talked to many ex-IBMers who share my take on it: That after a couple years, you look around at the long-term employees, and make a decision whether you want to be one or not. Most of the people I know decided against it.
    So while I think programs like that are a great start, IBM needs to also focus on those people who have been on board for 2-3 years, and keep that talent interested in IBM.

  4. David Bell Says:

    @3 – WebSphere is not a new platform – WAS came out in ‘98 and Portal in late 2001.

    I’m curious as to how anyone can think being locked into an MS architecture will ever be “cheap” ?

    Do you think the next major release of the MS stack will be an in-place upgrade or, if true to form, a complete rebuild at massive cost ?

  5. migratenotes Says:

    @4) That is a leading question. MS has always been harder to upgrade than Lotus. I don’t see that changing. If cost were your only criteria, though, I’d just go with something open source and skip both Notes/Domino and SharePoint. It becomes a business decision to determine whether or not the platforms give you enough business value to be worth the cost.

  6. jason Says:

    We are in the process of migrating from a huge Notes environment to Exchange and SharePoint. My company never took the upgrade path to websphere portal server. The main reason was because of the several years where IBM basically ignored Notes and let it waffle with no public direction or advertising. That stupid move killed Notes in so many organisations. Then out of the blue (no pun intended) they come out with this new found support of the product with Notes 8, Quickr and all that. Too little, too late. I can’t think of a single large company in my metro area that is not in the process of analyzing a Notes migration, currently migrating or already migrated. IBM really did a number on us Notes developers…


Comments are closed.